|
||||||||||||||
|
TSEC
Strategies for Teachers of 5-14 Science - Improving Science Education CPD through Practical Activities |
|
PREPARING FOR AN
INVESTIGATION
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level D |
LEVEL E |
LEVEL F |
| Individually or in small groups will identify two or three questions to investigate. | Individually or in small groups will identify a number of key questions to investigate. | Individually or in small groups will formulate a reasonable hypothesis about the outcomes of an investigation. |
| Should identify and select appropriate sources of information, evidence and resources or equipment and be able to give reasons for their planning decisions. | Should decide on appropriate strategies sources of information, evidence and resources or equipment to carry out a fair investigation. | Should be able to decide appropriate strategies sources of information, evidence and resources or equipment to investigate the hypothesis with due attention given to fair testing. |
| Should now be able to plan a fair test. | Should now be able to plan a valid and reliable test for a given hypothesis. | Planning should include finding out how one variable is dependent on another. |
Level D |
LEVEL E |
LEVEL F |
| Should select and use appropriate equipment and techniques to collect information. | Should select and use a range of equipment and standard techniques. | |
| Measurements should involve them in estimating and measuring accurately distance, time, weight, area, volume, temperature in small and large standard units selecting appropriate units and measuring device. | Measurements should involve them in estimating and measuring accurately to scale where appropriate. | |
| Should be able to select, given a range of options, an appropriate way of recording findings | Should be able to select, given a range of options, and use (without assistance) an appropriate way of recording findings | Should be able to select and use without assistance an appropriate way of recording findings |
Level D |
LEVEL E |
LEVEL F |
| Provide explanations for outcomes. | Should now establish link between the results and original hypothesis. | |
| Can give an illustrated report, organised in appropriate sequence with appropriate illustrations. | Should be able to write a systematic and structured report outlining the stages in their investigation using appropriate illustrations and scientific vocabulary. | |
| Should be able to reflect critically on the approach used and identify shortcomings. | Should be able to reflect critically on the approach used and identify shortcomings and limitations and suggest improvements that could be made | Should be able to evaluate a range of aspects of the investigation including reliability and relevance. |
The higher the temperature the faster the growth of mould
Oven, cupboard and fridge
9 sealable plastic bags
thermometer
9 slices of bread
graph paper
marker pen
acetate paper
scalpel

The bread from the same loaf was cut with the scalpel into squares of side 10cm to make sure they were all the same size.
Each of the nine squares of bread was carefully sealed in a plastic bag.
The temperature of the oven, the cupboard and the fridge was measured and recorded.
Three bags of bread were placed in the oven, three in the cupboard and three in the in the fridge.
Seven days later the bags were removed. Care was taken to avoid disturbing the seal.
The mould growth in each was recorded by placing an acetate sheet over the bag and drawing around the mould with a marker pen
The area of mould was measured by placing the acetate on millimetre graph paper. The squares covered were counted. Part squares in all samples were not counted.
|
Temperature( 0C) |
Area of sample 1(mm2) |
Area of sample 2(mm2) |
Area of sample 3(mm2) |
Average Area(mm2) |
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
21 |
10 |
15 |
21 |
15.33 |
|
30 |
42 |
32 |
48 |
40.67 |
Conclusion
and discussionThe results show that for this bread and this mould the higher the temperature (until 300C), the faster the growth of the mould. However there are only three temperature readings and to support the conclusion the experiment should be repeated with a wider range of temperatures perhaps at 50C, 100C, 200C, 250C and 300C.
To investigate whether this trend continues at higher temperatures, tests would have to be carried out at temperatures higher than 300C and as this is not possible in class the conclusion might only apply to temperatures lower than 300C.
To check whether the result applies generally, other breads could be investigated and perhaps other moulds.
Sample 2 was placed in the cupboard without light to keep the conditions the same as the other two samples but the temperature over the week varied.
The quantity of light was controlled but not the temperature; therefore this test should be repeated in an incubator as the results collected are not valid. To improve the accuracy of measuring the area of mould, a magnifying lens could be used and part squares covering more than half could be recorded as one.
|
to Science & Teaching Strategies |
© SSERC 2000-2008 Designed by Ian Birrell, Network Designer, SSERC